Vive la difference, and all that.
Its a simple gear that does what its supposed to and does it well.
Film key in: Instax mini filmPrint size: 62mm x 46mmPrint time: 15 sec.
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
approx..Developing time: 90 sec.
Detail is pretty sharp, but the small print size puts a limit on that.
The prints are hardy too: dont expect them to fade quickly or fall to bits in your wallet.
Some rival printers using Zink or dye-sublimation methods offer a smaller per-print cost.
I would say the Instax mini photos are better looking and more durable than Zink prints at least.
The mini Link 3 is lightweight and compact enough to slip into a large jacket pocket.
I wouldnt have any qualms about tossing it into a backpack either.
In the US its cheaper at $99.95 and available from theInstax site.
Battery life is excellent.
If you do deplete the battery, you’re able to fully recharge it in about two hours.
The prints have a peel-and-stick backing means you’re free to mount them quickly too.
Should I buy the Fujifilm Instax mini Link 3?
Theyre robust too, and wont fade or rub off easily.
You want large printsThe clues in the name.
Instax mini film delivers miniature prints, around the size of a credit card.
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
If you want larger images, consider the Instax Link Wide or Square Link.
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
(Image credit: Sam Kieldsen | Future)
